RANVIR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

(2.) This revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 10.3.2010 passed by Special Judge (D.A.A.), Etah in Complaint Case No. 57 of 2009 ( Ranvir Vs. Ajay Pal and others), whereby the complaint of the revisionist has been dismissed under Section 203 Cr.P.C.

(3.) It has been contended by the learned counsel for the revisionist that the learned Judge at the time of issuing of process has meticulously appreciated the evidence which was beyond his jurisdiction as he was only to see whether prima facie cognizable offence was disclosed against the accused persons or not. In support of his argument, learned counsel for the revisionist has placed reliance upon the judgment of Apex Court Kewal Krishan Vs. Suraj Bhan and Another, 1980 Supp1 SCC 499 wherein it has been held that: