REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

RAKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Appellant

V/S

CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

PRAKASH AND OTHERS V. RADHACHARAN AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
INDIA AND OTHERS V. ASHIS KUMAR GANGULY AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL CHANDRA GHOSH VS. RENU BALA MAJUMDAR [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS. JAGDAMBA OIL MILLS [REFERRED TO]
DELHI ADMINISTRATION VS. MANOHAR LAL [REFERRED TO]
BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY VS. PALITANA SUGAR MILL PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF M P VS. SANJAY KUMAR PATHAK [REFERRED TO]
SUBHA B NAIR VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. BANIBRATA GHOSH [REFERRED TO]
D M PREMKUMARI VS. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. UPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH SINGH VS. PUNJAB ENGINEERING COLLEGE [REFERRED TO]
SHESH MANI SHUKLA VS. D I O S DEORIA [REFERRED TO]
SARIKA VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
SHIV KUMAR DWIVEDI VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
Vibha Srivastava VS. Cantonment Board, Varanasi and others [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE are the three writ petitions connected with each other since basic facts and issues are common but relief sought by the petitioners are different. Therefore, as requested and agreed by learned counsel for the parties have been heard together.

(2.) SRI S.U. Upadhyay, advocate holding brief of Ms. Manisha Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 69008 of 2006, Sri Deepak Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 54665 of 2011 and for respondent in Writ Petition No. 69008 of 2006 and learned standing counsel for the respondents.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners has confined his case during the course of the argument only to the extent the aforesaid result relates to the candidates declared successful in the category of Physically Handicapped persons. He has also sought a mandamus directing respondents to appoint petitioner on the post of A.B.T. on the ground that petitioner is a general category (Physically Handicapped Person) candidate and there being 183 general vacancies, 5 would fall in Physically Handicapped quota but only one candidate has been declared successful.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address