MOHAMMAD KHALID KHAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THE petitioner was appointed as a Registration Clerk in the office of the Sub-Registrar, vide order, dated 26.11.1984 passed by the District Registrar, Bijnor. At the relevant time, petitioner was posted in Sub-Registrar's Office, Nazibabad, district Bijnor. He was confirmed on the post of Registration Clerk, vide order, dated 11.1.1991.

(3.) IN the fresh enquiry, one Shri Darshan Lal was appointed as INquiry Officer. After enquiry he submitted his enquiry report, dated 28.11.1991 and recommended reinstatement of the petitioner with full pay as charges levelled against the petitioner were not found to be established. Thereafter, some clarification was sought by the INquiry Officer from the petitioner, vide letter dated 27.3.1992, which were submitted by him and again an enquiry report was submitted on 4.5.1992 in favour of the petitioner by Shri Darshan Lal to the INspector General of Registration but no orders were passed and the petitioner was kept under suspension.