RAM ADHAR Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS first appeal from order is pending since 1991. On the date of hearing the learned Counsel has given an application that the appellant could not be contacted and it has been requested by the learned Counsel for the applicant that appellant should be informed from office.

(2.) I have perused the original file and the records. The learned Counsel for the applicant has taken so many adjournments and learned Counsel deliberately do not want to argue the case. Therefore, after perusal of the file the case is being decided on merits.

(3.) AS discussed above the case of the applicant has been wrongly allowed by the trial Court and there was no prima facie case that on the disputed property applicant's right has been perfected but the trial Court has wrongly ignored the established provisions of law and has passed the order which has been rightly set aside by the learned Additional Commissioner. This present first appeal from order is not maintainable because applicants have no prima facie case.