STATE OF U P Vs. B S YADAV

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. The parties agree that after exchange of counter and rejoinder-affidavits, the revision be disposed of finally at the admission stage by this Court.

(2.) THE revisionists have filed the present revision against the judgment and decree dated 25.3.1989 passed by the XIth Additional District Judge, Bareilly in Suit No. 20 of 1985, B. S. Yadav v. State of U. P. and another. THEy have prayed for the relief that the aforesaid judgment and decree dated 25.3. 1989 passed by the lower court be set aside and such other relief to which this Court may deem fit and proper, may be granted to the revisionists.

(3.) ACCORDING to the revisionists, U. P. Ordinance No. 13 of 1972 is not applicable on the present tenancy and after the period given in the lease deed had expired, the defendants did not vacate the accommodation in question. It is submitted that it was agreed that after expiry of the period of lease, the rate of rent will be the rate which is prevailing in the locality. It was further claimed that 1646 sq. feet carpet/area of the building was in the possession of the defendants and Rs. 4.000 per month can be taken as rent of the same.