INERMAN Vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and also perused the record. In these petitions common questions of law and facts are involved. Therefore, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. Writ Petition No. 839 of 1985 shall be the leading case.

(2.) BY means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 15.10.1984 passed by the respondent No. 1 and the notice dated 27.11.1982 contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition.

(3.) THE parties in support of their cases produced evidence, oral and documentary. The respondent No. 1 after perusing the material on the record and after hearing the parties passed the impugned order dated 15.10.1984, cancelling the allotment made in favour of the petitioner. Hence the present petition.