SURESH CHANDRA SAXENA Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE FARRUKHABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

(2.) THE petitioner has challenged the orders dated 23-1-90 and 31-1-90, Annexures 16 and 19 to the writ petition and the lists prepared on behalf of respondent No. 1, Annexures 4, 12 and 14 to the writ petition.

(3.) THESE questions are pure questions of fact and require appreciation of oral and documentary evidence for deciding the dispute and establishment of his legal rights by the petitioner.