BAJRANG BALE Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) GIRDHARI Lal, J. Heard the learned counsel for the revisionist on the point of admission and stay.

(2.) IT has been argued by the learned counsel for the revisionist that declaration under Section 229-B/204 of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act was decreed by the learned trial Court on 16-10-92. First appeal was preferred before the learned Additional Commissioner by State Government which was wrongly dismissed regarding Plot No. 370.

(3.) THE second appeal is not fit for admission and is dismissed accordingly.