LAWS(ALL)-2002-4-207

SITA RAM Vs. RAM MILAN

Decided On April 04, 2002
SITA RAM Appellant
V/S
RAM MILAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the revisionist on the point of admission.

(2.) IT has been argued by the learned Counsel for the revisionist that the learned Additional Commissioner has wrongly dismissed the revision filed by the revisionist.

(3.) THE learned Counsel for the revisionist has failed to show me any evidence which show that patta executed in favour of the opposite parties was Farzi patta.