PUTTI LAL Vs. CHEDDI LAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) GIRDHARI Lal, J. This revision has been filed against the order of the learned Additional Commissioner, Faizabad dated 9- 12-83.

(2.) BRIEF facts of this case is that Putti Lal and others have filed an application under Section 198 (4) of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act against Devi Ram and others on the ground that the disputed land Plot No. 700 is a public utility land and the applicants are using this land as Khaliyan and Gandhi Chabutara is also situated on this disputed land. A report was obtained from Tehsil and after considering the evidence adduced by both the parties the learned Collector Bahraich vide his order dated 8-9-1981 has rejected the application filed by present revisionist. Being aggrieved by this order a revision was preferred before the learned Additional Commissioner and revision was also dismissed on the ground that compromise has been filed between the parties. Being aggrieved by this order of the learned Additional Commissioner this present revision has been filed by Putti Lal and others.

(3.) IT has been argued by the learned counsel for the opposite- party that applicants revisionists are not aggrieved persons. If they claimed the disputed land as their own land they can filed a regular suit before the competent authorities.