LAWS(ALL)-2002-10-54

LALLAN Vs. SPECIAL JUDGE JAUNPUR

Decided On October 09, 2002
LALLAN Appellant
V/S
SPECIAL JUDGE JAUNPUR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. K. Rathi, J. I have heard Shri C. P. Dwivedi, learned Counsel for the applicant.

(2.) REQUEST is for transfer of Civil Revision No. 342 of 1999 pending in the Court of Special Judge, Jaunpur to High Court. The request has been made in the following circumstances.

(3.) IT has been contended by the learned Counsel that the learned Additional Judge before whom the Revision is pending has expressed his opinion that in view of the above judgment the revision cannot be decided by him. IT is contended that for this reason the Additional District Judge refused to extend the stay order and was going to dismiss the revision but it was not dismissed on the request of the appellant that he want to move an application for transfer. IT is further contended that one revision has been dismissed on this ground on 30-9-2002, by the District Judge, Jaunpur, the photocopy of the order has been annexed. IT has therefore, been argued that if the Additional District Judge has no jurisdiction to decide the revision it may be recalled to the High Court and be decided.