ANGOORI DEVI Vs. N O I D A

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Dr. Madhu Tandon, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri U. S. Awasthi and Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

(2.) THE petitioners, by means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, have prayed for the following reliefs :

(3.) A counter -affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents wherein it has been stated that the plot in question was already acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and has been handed over to the respondents, which is an authority constituted under the provisions of the U. P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, (hereinafter called the Act) Sri Awasthi appearing for the respondents has relied upon Sections 12 and 17 of the Act which provides that the provisions except to certain provisions referred in Sections 12 and 27 of the Urban Planning and Development Act contained in Chapter VIII of the Act which has not been made applicable by virtue of Section 12 of the Act.