PHOOL KALI Vs. RAM PYARI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been filed against the order dated 21-3-94 passed by learned Additional Commissioner, Faizabad dismissing the revision preferred against the order dated 30-6-93 passed by the trial Court in a case under Section 229-B of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act.

(2.) BRIEF facts of this case is that the learned trial Court vide his ordered dated 30-6-93 has passed the following order.

(3.) IT has been argued by the learned counsel for the revisionist that the order passed by the learned Additional Commissioner is against the law. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the revisionist that the application of the opposite party has been wrongly rejected by the trial Court.