JHINGAI Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to decide the representation of petitioner dated 23-11-1990 (Annexure-2 to the petition).

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner urged that even though his objection has been allowed by order dated 9-7-89, but nevertheless he made another representation (Annexure-2) and the same may be allowed.

(3.) IN State of U. P. v. Singhare Singh, AIR 1964 SC 358, it was held as follows :