ANIL KUMAR MISHRA Vs. MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA PARISHAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE six writ petitions are identical in nature. There is a common question of law and facts, therefore, they were heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.

(2.) THE petitioners' case is that they were working as clerks for writing certificaes of successful candidates who had passed High School and Intermediate Examinations. THEir appointment was in pursuance of an advertisment notice A written test was held THEreafter the petitioners were interviewed and the petitioners came to be appointed as Certificate Writers.

(3.) THE case set out in writ petition No. 11144 of 1988 is the similar which is mentioned in writ petition No 10718 of 1988