RAM PRAKASH SINGH Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NO counter affidavit has been filed though time for the same was granted as far back as on 9-1-1990. As to controversy raised in this petition is directly covered by several decisions of this Court reference of some of which has been made in the petition itself, this petition is being disposed of finally.

(2.) THE petitioner was appointed as Asstt Wasli Baqi Nawis (A.W B.N. for short) after regular selection by means of a letter dated 21-1-1987. On the basis of the letter of appointment, the petitioner assumed charge of the above post and was working to the entire satisfaction of his superiors. In the letter of appointment no specific period of teem was fixed THE collector. Farukhabad, however, stopped allotting any work to the petitioner even though he was regularly reporting for duty. Subsequently, it transpired that this was because the Collector thought tint the select list in which the petitioner's name was placed on the basis of selection was valid only for one year and that it automatically lapsed

(3.) A copy of this order may be given to the learned counsel on payment of requisite charges within three days. Petition allowed.