KHURSHEED HUSSAIN Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND COLLECTOR BAREILLY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Petitioner in this writ petition is the duly elected pramukh of Kshetriya Samiti Bhaujipura district Bareilly. A notice for motion of no confidence was given to the Collector Bareilly on 17 -3 -1990 by respondent No. 3 which was supported by other members of Kshetriya Samiti as well. The Collector Bareilly at the first instance verified the signatures of the members who were said to be supporting the notice for motion of no confidence. The meeting for consideration of motion of no confidence was actually fixed for 2nd July 1990. At the admission stage counter has been filed on behalf of contesting Respondent Mahendrapal Singh to which rejoinder affidavit has also been filed, and so the present writ petition is being disposed of finally in accordance with the rules of the court.

(2.) LIST has been revised, counsel for the Petitioner is present. However, no one is present on behalf of contesting Respondent No. 3. Standing counsel is present on behalf of Respondents 1 and 2.

(3.) FOR the purpose of deciding controversy raised in this writ petition it will be useful to quote the relevant part of Section 15(3) of the Adhiniyam, 1961 which runs as follows: