UDAI NARAIN RAI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) FEELING aggrieved against the operative portion of the judgment dated November 21, 1990, delivered by Honourable H. C. Mithal, J. (Retired) in the aforesaid writ petition, the State of Uttar Pradesh has preferred this review petition. The judgment dated November 21, 1990 is Udai Narain Rai v. State of U. P. (1991) 1 UP LB EC 140.

(2.) THE facts which necessitated the filing of the writ petition by the petitioners opposite parties brieflly stated are that the petitioners Udai Narain Rai, Kamla Prasad Rai and Ram Dutt Mishra are Sub-Inspector of Police. Selections for promotion to the post of Inspectors of Police was held in the year 1988 in which the petitioners were also called for interview. THE result was declared on 31-12-1988 in which the names of the petitioners did not figure. THEreupon the petitioners opposite parties challenged the action of the Selection Committee in not selecting them to the post of Inspectors of Police. Promotion of respondents nos 3 to 9, namely, Rajendra Singh, Lok Nath Verma, Lal Chandra Bhartiya, Baleshwar Yadav, Raghvendra Singh, Tirath Raj Pandey and Mahesh Narain Mishra, who were selected in the said selection, was also challenged and it was prayed that the same may be quashed. THE aforesaid respondents were not served with the notice of the writ petition and had no opportunity to controvert the allegations made against them in the writ petition and as such a statement was made by the counsel for the petitioners opposite parties that the petitioners opposite parties did not want their selection to be quashed.

(3.) IT appears that in the meantime on June 18, 1991 the Police , Head Quarter on behalf of the State of U. P. filed a Special Leave Petition against the judgment dated November 21, 1990, passed by this Court in the Supreme Court of India.