RAMESH CHANDRA Vs. BANARSI DAS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner was the tenant of shop No. 6/287/3 and 6/287/4, Behat Road, Saharanpur. The landlords filed an application under Section 21(1)(a) and (b) of U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for release of both the shops.

(2.) THE case set up by the landlords was that the petitioner was a tenant at the rate of Rs. 25/ - per month. The building in which the said two shops were situate was in a dilapidated condition. It required demolition and new construction. The said building on account of its decayed condition has become unsafe. Cracks had developed in the roof and beam of the building. The building in question has become extremely dangerous to the adjoining buildings and to the passersby. It has become a danger to human life. They had sufficient financial capacity for the proposed demolition and new construction. The plan of the proposed building has been sanctioned. The proper estimate of expenditure for the proposed demolition and new construction has also been shown.

(3.) THE petitioner contested the release application. It was denied that the building was in a dilapidated condition and needed demolition and new construction. The building' was in extremely good condition. The need set up was not a bona fide one. The provisions of Rule 17 of the Rules framed under the Act have not been complied with. The application under Section 21(1)(b) of the Act was not maintainable.