BAKRIDI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. R. Bhargava, J. This revision, under Section 397 Cr. P. C. is directed against summoning order dated 7. 1. 86, passed by the Magistrate in the following circumstances :

(2.) OPPOSITE party No. 3 Durga Prasad lodged a First Information Report against the revisionists for offences under Sections 323/504/506 I. P. C. Subsequently, the case was converted under Sections 323/325/504 I. P. C. Case was investigated. Ultimately Final Report was submitted to the effect that the investigation showed only altercation be tween the parties and a case of assault etc. was false. Notice was issued to the informant opposite party No. 3. He appeared and filed protest petition accompanied by affidavit.

(3.) REVISION has no force and is hereby rejected. Stay order dated 28. 5. 86 is vacated. REVISIONists Bakridi, Rahmatullah and Paras Nath are directed to appear before the Magistrate concerned voluntarily. On other appearance they shall not be taken into judicial custody. Instead they shall be required only to furnish bonds with or without sureties as laid down in Section 88 Cr. P. C. But these directions shall be complied with by the Magistrate only if the revisionist are not already on bail. REVISION rejected. .