(1.) This revision is directed against the judgment dated 8th April 1981 passed by II Additional Sessions Judge, Nainital in a case under Sec. 7 read with Sec. 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.
(2.) The facts of the case, briefly stated, are as follows:-
(3.) The only contention raised by the learned counsel for the applicant before me was that there has been no compliance in this case of Sec. 13(2) of the the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. Sec. 13(2) requires:-