RAJESHWAR Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SABHAPATI, opposite party No. 2 in the present writ petition had filed a suit under section 229-B of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act against the Gaon Sabha and State of U. P.

(2.) THE aforesaid suit was decreed on 29-12-1970. THEreafter an application for setting aside the ex-parte decree was moved on behalf of the State of 0. P. but the same was rejected.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the petitioners has strenuously argued that the petitioners being members of the village can maintain the present writ petition. I had expressed my doubt to the learned counsel for the petitioners about maintainability of the present writ petition during the course of argument.