RAMESHWAR DAYAL Vs. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER GHATAMPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution for quashing of an order passed by opposite party No. 1 and for a direction to him to stay transfer of the charge of the office of Pradhan to opposite party No. 2 and not to remove the petitioner from the office of Pradhan during the pendency of an election petition filed by him against the election of opposite party No. 2 as Pradhan. On 4-5-1961 we dismissed the petition and said that the reasons for dismissing it would be placed on record later. We now give the reasons for our order.

(2.) The petitioner was elected as Pradhan of a Gaon Sabha in 1955. The next election for the office of Pradhan was held in December, 1960 opposite Party No. 2, and the petitioner contested the election, and opposite party No. 2 was declared elected. The petitioner filed an election petition in the Court of opposite party No. 1 challenging the election of opposite party No. 2 on various grounds, He also applied to opposite party No. 1 for not transferring the charge of the office from the petitioner to opposite party no. 2 pending disposal of the election petition, but the opposite party No. 1 dismissed his application on the ground that he had no jurisdiction to stay transfer of charge. It is this order of opposite party No. 1 that the petitioner seeks through this petition to be quashed. When this Court admitted this petition it directed that until further orders the petitioner would not be removed from the office of Pradhan, with the consequences that the petitioner continued to hold the office of Pradhan till 4-5-1961.

(3.) A Pradhan of a Gaon Sabha is elected by its members and his term commences on the date of the constitution of the Gaon Panchayat, or on the date of his election, whichever is later, and expires with the term of the Gaon Panchayat; vide Section 11-B of the Panchayat Raj Act. The election of a person as Pradhan cannot be called in question except by an application presented to the proscribed authority on the ground that the election had not been a free election for a certain reason, or that it had Seen materially affected by the improper acceptance or rejection of a nomination, or by gross failure to comply with the provisions of the Act; vide Section 12-C. An application to question the election (which would be referred to as an election petition henceforth) may be presented by any candidate at the election or by an elector. Sub-section (4J of Section 12-C reads as follows: