LAWS(ALL)-2021-8-20

VIMLA RANI AGARWAL Vs. STATE OF U P

Decided On August 13, 2021
Vimla Rani Agarwal Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General along with Sri J.N.Maurya, learned Chief Standing Counsel for respondents-State.

(2.) This writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 22.3.2021 passed by respondent No.2 in Appeal under Section 56(1-A) of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter called as "Act, 1899") and order dated 25.10.2018 passed by respondent No.3 in Case No.740 of 2015 in proceedings under Section 47-A of Act, 1899.

(3.) The facts in brief giving rise to the present petition are that petitioner had purchased the agricultural land of Khasra No.637 measuring about 0.105 Hectare situated at Mauza Sunrakh Bangar, Tehsil and District Mathura vide registered sale deed dated 08.05.2013. A stamp duty of Rs.78,200/- was paid according to the circle rate. The proceedings under the Act, 1899 was initiated at the behest of Additional Commissioner Stamp, Mathura on 25.7.2015 and notice under Section 47-A of Act, 1899 was issued. An objection was submitted by the petitioner denying any deficiency in stamp duty and it was specifically stated that Khasra Nos.637 and 604, whose original tenure holder was Smt. Sharda Devi Motiwala and Smt. Manju Vani Devi and one Ruchi Agrawal. A declaration under Section 143 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter called as "Act, 1950") was made by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mathura on 16.7.2005. It was in the year 2009 that on the application moved in respect of these two khasra numbers that on the report of Tehsildar dated 07.09.2009, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mathura proceeded to declare the said land as ''agricultural' under Section 144 of the Act, 1950. It is further averred that once the land was declared as ''agricultural', the petitioner had purchased the same through registered sale deed on 08.05.2013 and had paid stamp duty as per the circle rate. The respondent No.3/Assistant Commissioner Stamp Mathura, after considering the objection filed by petitioner, vide detailed order dated 25.10.2018, held that there was deficiency of stamp duty of Rs.3,52,000/- and imposed penalty of Rs.20,000/- and further directed that interest at the rate of 1.5% per month will be levied till the date of payment of balance amount of stamp duty along with penalty from the date of execution of the document.