REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

AJAY KUMAR PANDEY Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SUDHIR BHASKAR RAO TAMBE VS. HEMANT YASWANT DHAGE [REFERRED TO]
H N RISHBUD VS. STATE OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
INCOME TAX OFFICER CANNANORE VS. M K MOHAMMAD KUNHI [REFERRED TO]
MANEKA GANDHI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
HUSSAINARA KHATOON 1 VS. HOME SECRETARY STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. J A C SALDANHA:J A C SALDANHA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. J A C SALDANHA:J A C SALDANHA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. PARAS LAMINATES PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL REHMAN ANTULAY VS. R S NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
RAMPAL PITHWA RAHIDAS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA:BASAWAN [REFERRED TO]
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA VS. PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
J K SYNTHETICS LIMITED VS. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DELHI VS. REGISTRAR DELHI HIGH COURT NEW DELHI [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. SUSHIL KUMAR MODI [REFERRED TO]
CHEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND VICE CHAIRMAN GUJARAT MARITIME BOARD VS. HAJI DAUD HAJI HARUN ABU [REFERRED TO]
VINEETNARAIN VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
P RAMACHANDRA RAO VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. VISHWABARATHI HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. PRAKASH P HINDUJA [REFERRED TO]
MOHD YOUSUF VS. AFAQ JAHAN [REFERRED TO]
SASI THOMAS VS. STATE TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
DILAWAR SINGH VS. STATE OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
DILAWAR SINGH VS. STATE OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
SAKIRI VASU VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
RUBABBUDDIN SHEIKH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
DISHA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
VINAY TYAGI VS. IRSHAD ALI @ DEEPAK [REFERRED TO]
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY VS. DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [REFERRED TO]
DILAWAR VS. THE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. [REFERRED TO]
VINUBHAI HARIBHAI MALAVIYA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents in this batch of writ petitions.

(2.) All the above noted writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners praying for a direction to the concerned police authorities for fair and proper investigation in criminal cases in which investigation is going on. Thus, following questions of law are involved in the present writ petition:-

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that an important facet of the rule of law is that in criminal justice system, investigation into the crime should be fair, in accordance with law and should not be tainted. Therefore, if the investigating authority is not fairly and properly investigating into crime then this court has power to issue appropriate directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. They further submitted that once the power is available to this court, there is no need to invoke the powers of the concerned Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C. ').

Click here to view full judgment.

AJAY KUMAR PANDEY Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address