NEERAJ KUMAR MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Mr. Nagendra Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.1 to 3 and Mr. Raj Kr. Singh Suryavanshi, learned counsel for opposite party no.5. In view of the order proposed to be passed in this petition, notices to opposite party no.4 stand dispensed with. Petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:

(2.) Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher L.T. Grde on 20.07.2019 but financial approval and salary payment have not yet been made to petitioner despite reminder from the Committee of Management. It is submitted that similar dispute has already been adjudicated upon by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Sanjay Singh and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors. (Civil Appeal No.8300 of 2016) with the following observations:

(3.) It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the petitioner's case is to be covered by aforesaid paragraph 11 of the said judgment.