KUMAR SAMBHAV PAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri A.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Purnendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India and Shri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the respondent no.2/Senior Director, National Testing Agency, Ministry of Education, Government of India, New Delhi.

(2.) The present writ petition is preferred seeking following reliefs:-

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner belongs to Other Backward Class Category. He appeared in National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (Under Graduate)-2020(NEET (UG)-2020) on 13.9.2020. After conducting the aforesaid examination, the National Testing Agency (NTA) uploaded the answer key for different series of booklets on 26.09.2020. The petitioner did not challenge his answer key uploaded by the NTA. Thereafter, the NTA released the OMR sheets of NEET (UG)-2020 on 05.10.2020 and also uploaded the scanned image of OMR sheets of all the candidates. Finally, the NTA declared the result on 16.10.2020 and on the same day, the score cards of all candidates were also uploaded. After declaration of the final result, the petitioner came to know that there is a huge difference between the marks as obtained by him and the marks, which were expected to be secured by the petitioner. As per his own calculation based on the answer keys, the petitioner expected to score more than 600 marks out of 720. It is claimed that due to non-downloading the scanned image of the OMR sheet uploaded on the official website of NTA, the petitioner could not participate in the counselling and he was surprised to know that he had secured 146 marks out of 720. This situation has impelled the petitioner to approach before this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India.