REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

MAHESH CHANDRA Appellant

V/S

Avinash Kumar Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

HARIHAR PRASAD AND OTHERS V. UDAIBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
SAMAR SINGH V. KEDAR NATH [REFERRED TO]
GANGA PRASAD RAI VS. KEDAR NATH AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
ROMAN CATHOLIC MISSION MEENAKSHI SUNDARESWARAL VS. STATE OF MADRAS:ROMAN CATHOLIC MISSION [REFERRED TO]
NIRMALA ANAND VS. ADVENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
NIRMALA ANAND VS. ADVENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
R V E VENKATACHALA GOUNDER VS. ARULMIGU VISWESARASWAMI AND V P TEMPLE [REFERRED TO]
P DSOUZA VS. SHONDRILO NAIDU [REFERRED TO]
VITHALBHAI PVT LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
P S RANAKRISHNA REDDY VS. M K BHAGYALAKSHMI [REFERRED TO]
NARINDERJIT SINGH VS. NORTH STAR ESTATE PROMOTERS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
MALKHAN SINGH VS. RAGHUBIR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
DOORGA PROSAD CHAMARIA VS. SECRETARY OF STATE [REFERRED TO]
SATYA JAIN D THR. LRS VS. ANIS AHMED RUSHDIE D TR.LRS [REFERRED TO]
K. PRAKASH VS. B.R. SAMPATH KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
SUNKARA LAKSHMINARASAMMA (D) BY LRS. VS. SAGI SUBBA RAJU & OTHERS ETC. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These two second appeals have arisen from a suit for specific performance of contract. Second Appeal No. 1873 of 1985 has been preferred by the plaintiff, whereas Second Appeal No. 2315 of 1985 has been brought by the defendant. Both appeals have been heard together. Second Appeal No. 1873 of 1985 shall be treated to be the leading case.

(2.) The facts giving rise to the two appeals are these :

(3.) The plaintiff's case is that a registered agreement to sell dated 02.05.1980 was executed between him and the defendant, where the defendant covenanted to sell, for an agreed sale consideration of Rs. 15,000/-, his 1/5th share in the agricultural land of Khata no. 254, plot no. 545, admeasuring 24 bigha 10 biswa 11 biswansi, situate at Village Azimabad Machhua, Pargana and Tehsil Koil, District Aligarh. The said land is hereinafter referred to as the ''suit property'. The registered agreement to sell dated 02.05.1980 shall be called the 'suit agreement'.

Click here to view full judgment.

MAHESH CHANDRA Vs. AVINASH KUMAR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address