SHANKAR LAL Vs. STATE OF U. P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri Pramod Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ashish Kumar Mishra, learned Advocate, holding brief of Shri Krishna Mishra, learned counsel for the impleadment applicants, learned Standing Counsel representing the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and perused the record.

(2.) In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case and the order proposed to be pased hereunder, this Court proceeded to finally decide this matter at the admission stage with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, without calling for their respective affidavits, with liberty to the respondents to move recall application, in case, the details of the facts as given in the present writ petiton are found incorrect.

(3.) In this view of the matter, since 14.11.1977, name of the predecessor in the interest of the present applicants was deleted by the judicial order. At this juncture, right and title of the present applicants cannot be recognized by this Hon'ble Court, directly, without it's adjudication by the competent Courts. Present applicants, in case, have any grievance with respect to the entries and judicial orders passed in favour of the petitioner and predecessors in his interest, they can file an appropriate application/suit before the competent Courts to get their right and title declared by way of taking suitable steps under the law as advised.