SMT. SEEMA ARORA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) The present writ petition has been filed for the following main reliefs:-

(3.) At the very outset, Sri Alok Saxena, learned counsel for the State of Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as "Bank") as also learned State counsel submitted that the instant writ petition is not maintainable. It is in view of Section 17 of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "Act of 2002"), where the remedy is available to the petitioners.