REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

REENA Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U. P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

JAGAT OHANDRA MOZUMDAR V. QUEEN EMPRESS [REFERRED TO]
MOHD. ALLAUDDIN KHAN VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
RAJEEV KAURAV VS. BALASAHAB [REFERRED TO]
IN RE: SHRIPAD G. CHANDAVARKAR [REFERRED TO]
R P KAPUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
DHANALAKSHMI VS. R PRASANNA KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. BHAJAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. P P SHARMA IAS [REFERRED TO]
RUPAN DEOL BAJAJ MRS B R BAJAJ VS. KANWAR PAL SINGH GILL:STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
RUPAN DEOL BAJAJ MRS B R BAJAJ VS. KANWAR PAL SINGH GILL:STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
PEPSI FOODS LIMITED VS. SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. O C KUTTAN :STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
ZANDU PHARMACEUTICAL WORKS LTD VS. SHARAFUL HAQUE [REFERRED TO]
M N OJHA VS. ALOK KUMAR SRIVASTAV [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR SINGH GANDA SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant today in the Court, is taken on record.

(2.) The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge-sheet dated 05.02.2019 as well as the cognizance order dated 06.02.2019 as well as the entire proceedings of S.T. No. 129of 2019 (State Vs. Virendra Gupta and others), arising out of Case Crime No.12 of 2019, under Sections 304B I.P.C. as also under Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-G.R.P., Kanpur Nagar, District-Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar.

(3.) Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the entire material available on record. It is not necessary to issue notice to opposite party no.2, as he has no right to be heard at pre-cognizance stage

Click here to view full judgment.

REENA Vs. STATE OF U. P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address