KHATOON BIBI Vs. RAMNATH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Sri R.S. Tripathi has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No. 1/1 and 1/2. He submitted that he was allowed some time to file objection to the report submitted by Prescribed Authority pursuant to this Court's order dated 24.9.2008. The relevant extract of the report has been quoted by this Court in its order dated 25.8.2010 and it reads as under:

(2.) An application was filed by landlord for release of premises in question namely House No. 65/4, Begum Ward Shahar, Pratapgarh under section 21(1)(b) of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972) which was allowed by Prescribed Authority by order dated 29.4.1986 directing the opposite party-tenant to vacate premises in question within one month so that the landlord may proceed for its demolition and reconstruction. Aggrieved by the order dated 29.4.1986 opposite party-tenant filed Rent Control Appeal No. 1 of 1986 which was allowed by order dated 28.9.1989. The appellate Court came to the conclusion that since the building in question is liable of repair therefore cannot be said to be dilapidated.