ASHIQ ALI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Ashish Tripathi learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashish Verma for opposite party no. 4 and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.

(2.) IT has been submitted that on the demise of the Pradhan the opposite party no. 4 has been appointed as the temporary Pradhan by the District Magistrate. This exercise has not been done in accordance with law. No meeting of the members has been conducted. This order is non-speaking and cryptic. The petitioner has placed reliance on a judgment 2010)2 UPLBEC 1062 (Pushpendra Kumar vs. State of U.P. and others), which says as under: