PREM LATA Vs. JOGINDER LAL JAIN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed challenging the validity and correctness of the order dated 22.2.2008 passed in S.C.C. Suit No. 91 of 2005 and order dated 7.2.2011, passed in S.C.C. Revision No. 23 of 2008.

(3.) IT is stated that on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the trial Court framed four issues namely (1) whether the defendant has committed default in payment of rent? (2) whether the defendant is entitled to get benefit of Section 20 (4) of the Act?; (3) whether the defendant has changed the user of shop from commercial to residential purposes in respect of the back portion of the shop, and the defendant is liable to be ejected on this ground?