REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ONKAR NATH SRIVASTAVA Appellant

V/S

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

KALYAN RAI SAXENA V. THE LLND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,BULANDSHAHR AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
COLONEL BROWN CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL,DEHRA DUN V. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,DEHRA DUN AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
SONPAL V. 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,ALIGARH AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
SMT. SHAMSHUN NISHA V. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,LUCKNOW AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY SHAYAM AND OTHERS V. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE,LUCKNOW AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
BADRINARAYAN CHUNILAL BHUTADA VS. GOVINDRAM RAMGOPAL MUNDADA [REFERRED TO]
REVAJEETU BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS VS. NARAYANASWAMY AND SONS [REFERRED TO]
RANDHIR SINGH SHEORAN VS. VITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE MUZAFFAR NAGAR [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY SHYAM VS. A D J COURT NO 13 [REFERRED TO]
AVINASH CHANDRA TEWARI VS. A D J COURT NO 3 UNNAO [REFERRED TO]
SMT. RADHA RANI MEHROTRA AND 5 ORS. VS. LEARNED PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY/CIVIL JUDGE S.D. AND 2 ORS. [REFERRED TO]
RAJARAM AND OTHERS VS. IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, FARRUKHABAD AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri R.P. Singh learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri D.C. Jain, learned Counsel for the Respondents.

(2.) In para-10 of the release application it has been stated that the family of the applicant consist of his wife two daughters and one son and other are co-owners/landlords of the premises in question had no objection if the same be released in his favour.

(3.) Accordingly, a P.A. Case No. 3 of 2001 (B.N. Verma v. Onkar Nath Srivastava) registered before prescribed authority/Civil Judge(Junior Division) Brabanki in order to decide the controversy in question has framed three issues were framed namely:

Click here to view full judgment.

ONKAR NATH SRIVASTAVA Vs. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE BARABANKI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address