CHHUNNA ALIAS BRIJESH Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) List has been revised. Case is called out. None is present for petitioner. However, Shri R.K.Jaiswal, learned counsel for the applicant- respondent is present and presses the application for recall of order dated 31.3.2011.

(2.) Before signing the aforesaid order passed today, when I perused Section 362.of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, I found that no Court can alter or review the order after it has been signed except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. The provision of Section 362 is reproduced here-in-under:-

(3.) In light of the aforesaid provision, I realize that the learned counsel for the applicant misled the Court by moving an application for recall of final order and also succeeded to get stayed the enforcement of order, which is not appreciable. It is the duty of the counsel to apprise the correct law to the Court, applicable in the matter concerned, without involving himself in the result of the case, but it appears that the learned counsel for the applicant failed to discharge his duty, which is deprecated and he is cautioned to take care in future.