MAHENDRA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SINCE both the appeals are arising out of a judgment and order dated 30.3.2011, passed by Additional Sessions Judge(E.C. Act)/Additional District Judge, Aligarh in C.C. Case No. 96 of 1998, arising out of case crime No. 267 of 1998, State v. Pradeep alias Jaipal and Ors., under Section 7(Ka)(II) Essential Commodities Act, P.S. Gonda, District Aligarh, convicting and sentencing the Appellants to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/ - each, failing which they shall further undergo for a period of three months rigorous imprisonment. Therefore, the prayers for bail in these appeals is being disposed of by means of a common order.

(2.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the Appellant Mahendra in Criminal Appeal No. 1952 of 2011, the learned Counsel for the Appellant Lokman Singh in the connected Criminal appeal No. 1982 of 2011, and the learned AGA for the State.

(3.) IT is further submitted that the co -accused Pradeep alias Jaipal Singh and Dharma, who are said to have arrested at the spot had already been granted bail by the another Bench of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 2011 of 2011. It is further pointed out that on 28.3.2011 the charges were framed against the Appellants and other accused persons and on 30.3.2011 the judgment was pronounced convicting the Appellants for five years imprisonment under the aforesaid offence. The Appellants were on bail during the trial and they had never misused the liberty of bail.