AJAY KUMAR Vs. D D C

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners Sri Kaushik holding brief of Sri Irshad Ali and Sri T.A. Khan for the respondent no. 3 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2.

(2.) THE matter had been adjourned on 28.11.2011 by the following order:-

(3.) AGGRIEVED by the said order the respondent no. 3 filed an appeal contending that this could not have been done as the respondent had already been put into possession after the allocation made in his favour. The appeal was allowed and at the same time the appellate authority upheld the order relating to the part of land being kept out of consolidation operations without indicating the direction of the said plot which was to be kept out of consolidation operations. A revision was filed by the petitioner which was dismissed in default whereafter it was restored and again it was dismissed in default whereupon another restoration application was filed which has been rejected and while rejecting the same the revision also has been dismissed on merits holding that the order of the Settlement Officer Consolidation on merits does not suffer from any infirmity.