REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

NUPUR TALWAR Appellant

V/S

C.B.I. DELHI Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

JAGDISH RAM V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
ABHINANDAN JHA ROOPCHAND LAL VS. DINESH MISHRA:STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA VS. M V DABHOLKAR [REFERRED TO]
VEERA IBRAHIM VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
HARERAM SATPATHY VS. TIKARAM AGARWALA [REFERRED TO]
THAMMANNA VS. K VEERA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
KISHUN SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT VS. DEEPAK MAHAJAN [REFERRED TO]
RANJIT SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
HASANBHAI VALIBHAI QURESHI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
SASI THOMAS VS. STATE TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
KISHAN LAL VS. DHARMENDRA BAFNA [REFERRED TO]
UMA SHANKAR SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
AMIN VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Samit Gopal, learned Counsel for the revisionist, Sri N.I. Jafri and Sri Anuraag Khanna, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 1 and Sri D.R. Chaudhary, learned Government Advocate for the opposite party No. 2.

(2.) This applications revision has been filed by the revisionist Dr. (Mrs.) Nupur Talwar against the order dated 9.2.2011 passed by Special Judicial Magistrate (C.B.I), Ghaziabad in Special Case No. 1 of 2011 Rajesh Talwar v. Unknown under Section 302 I.P.C. P.S. S.C.B. C.B.I., Delhi by which he has taken cognizance of offences under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 I.P.C. and issued process under Section 204 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the revisionist to face trial for the aforementioned offences.

(3.) Learned Counsel for the opposite parties have stated that they do not want to file any counter-affidavit and this application in revision may be disposed of at this stage on the basis of the materials brought on record by the revisionist.

Click here to view full judgment.

NUPUR TALWAR Vs. C B I DELHI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address