GEETA RANI Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioners contend that the respondent No. 4 had claimed succession by virtue of being the daughter of late Sri Harkesh through his second wife Smt. Husani but she was not entitled for an exclusive succession to the holding of late Harkesh. The petitioners are the three married daughters of late Harkesh through his first wife namely Smt. Khajani. To demonstrate the relationship of the parties the pedigree is extracted hereinunder:

(2.) I have heard Sri R.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Dhirendra Pratap Singh holding brief of Sri Aslam Ansari learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

(3.) Learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 and the learned Standing Counsel submit that they do not propose to file any counter-affidavit and the matter be disposed of finally as the entire material is already on record. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the matter is being disposed of finally at this stage.