VED PRAKASH PANDEY Vs. ASHOK KUMAR AND ANR.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, learned Counsel for the applicant and Sri M.N. Singh, learned Counsel, who has put in appearance on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 1.

(2.) COUNTER and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged between the parties.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner was also terminated along with Shree Shankar Bajpayee on the same date and, therefore, when his writ petition has been decided in the same terms then he would also be entitled to be reinstated and to be paid his salary and all the arrears and allowances. Learned Counsel states that when the opposite parties have not complied with the directions issued by the Writ Court regarding payment of salary and arrears he has filed this contempt petition although he has been reinstated.