LALLAN PRASAD Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Ms. Nita Chaowdhury, Principal Secretary, Medical, Health and Family Welfare, Government of U.P., Civil Secretariat, Lucknow has filed an affidavit saying that the State Government has made the policies. For all practical purposes paragraphs of the affidavit are quoted below:

(2.) That in compliance of the order passed by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court on 22.4.2010 in the aforesaid writ petition, the State Government has made the following policy for posting as Chief Medical Officer, Chief Medical Superintendent, Chief Medical Superintendent (Female) and District Tuberculosis Officer:

(3.) We have surprised about the submission in terms of point No. (a) above because it was clear understanding between the parties in presence of the Court that the Principal Secretary, Medical, Health and Family Welfare, Government of U.P. will not be under threat of contempt but as per desire of the Court for the purposes of real assistance to the Advocate General/Additional Advocate General/ Senior Counsel representing the case of the State and for solution of the matter in the Court. Against this background, reference to the aforesaid judgment of the Supreme Court as cited by Mr. Ravi Kant is uncalled for. When the Court was displeased, he has withdrawn his submission in terms of point No. (a) above.