SHIV SHAKTI TRADING COMPANY HANUMAN GANJ Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By consent of parties, this petition has been heard and disposed of finally at the admission stage itself, without calling for any counter affidavit considering the controversy involved.

(2.) The petitioner, by means of the present writ petition, has impugned the seizure order dated 07.05.2011 on the following grounds:-

(3.) The petitioner, a proprietary concern, contends that its TIN No. 09985603867 was suspended on 04.05.2011 and subsequently cancelled on 10.05.2011. These orders, according to the petitioner, have been passed ex parte, without observing the principles of natural justice and in violation of the statutory norms. The petitioner has challenged these two orders by filing separate proceedings. In the instant case, what is challenged is the order of seizure dated 07.05.2011 passed by respondent no.2.