KRISHNA MURARI TRIPATHI Vs. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Rakesh Pandey, teamed counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, Sri Ved Vyas Mishra, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed for quashing of the order of the Manager of the institution dated 20th November, 1990 enclosed as Annexure-8 to the present writ petition.

(3.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, though his appointment was earlier approved by the Vice-Chancellor of the University, the Registrar of the University wrote a letter to the Committee of Management of the institution on 31st July, 1990, asking it to make regular appointment in accordance with the provisions of statute 11.21 of the First Statutes of the University. However, no order was passed in respect of his continuance or otherwise by the University. It is stated that the said letter had been issued under misconception. On that basis, the Manager of the institution issued the impugned order dated 20th November, 1990, terminating the appointment of the petitioner. It has been stated that the order dated 20th November, 1990, in response to the letter of the Registrar of the University dated 31st July, 1990 was illegal and misconceived.