SHAMBHU SHARAN SINGH Vs. RAEBARELI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is being heard finally at the admission stage.

(2.) IN District Raebareli multi storey 50 chambers have been constructed in the Civil Court campus for the allotment to the lawyers with regard to professional use. A notice/guideline has been circulated by the District Judge, Raebareli, which is contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition laying down criteria for allotment of chambers. The petitioner is aggrieved by condition Nos. 4 and 5 of the impugned notice which is reproduced as under: <IMG>JUDGEMENT_865_ADJ1_2011Image1.jpg</IMG>

(3.) LEARNED Standing Counsel submits that the guidelines have been framed in terms of Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Vijay Shanker Tripathi and others (Supra) but it does not seem to be correct. In the case of Vijay Shanker Tripathi and others (Supra) in para 42, this Court held as under :