RAJ NARAIN SHUKLA S/O LATE BRINDAVAN SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. A.P. Singh, learned Counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and perused the records.

(2.) THE writ petition has been filed for a suitable order or direction to the opposite parties to conclude the disciplinary proceedings arising out of the charge -sheet dated 20.1.1992 within a reasonable time in terms of the judgment and order dated 28.11.2003 passed by the learned Special Judge (P.C. Act), Lucknow and thereafter pass appropriate orders with regard to the post retirement benefits of the Petitioner.

(3.) IT is further submitted by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that by letter dated 27.7.2010 the Petitioner was called to submit reply to the charge -sheet and the Petitioner had submitted his reply on 31.7.2010. However, since then the disciplinary proceedings are pending and no decision has been taken, so far.