SUBHASH TIWARI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THE petitioner has sought a mandamus commanding the respondents to grant annual increments to him which have not been allowed since 1986.

(3.) MERE pendency of a criminal case cannot justify withholding of increments unless specific order is passed in accordance with law to this effect.