NANGEY ANSARI Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record.

(2.) The learned A.G.A. on the other hand argued that there is criminal history of the accused applicant and he may not be released on bail. In reply the learned counsel for the applicant pointed out that in 4 cases he has already been acquitted and this fact has been stated in the Rejoinder affidavit filed today. One case shown at crime no. 119 of 1983 is not related to the accused, another case under section 110 Cr.P.C. has already been concluded the case at Crime No. 48 of 1999 was not registered against him and a case at crime no. 12 of 1998 relates to some notice under the Gangster Act regarding the property. The case at Crime No. 1397 of 2010 has been registered after the present case and thus only case under section 4/25 Arms Act is pending against the accused.

(3.) I considered over the matter. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into the merit of the case, I am satisfied that a case for bail is made out and the accused applicant may be released on bail by imposing certain conditions :