HEMENDRA KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner has made the following prayers in the writ petition :

(2.) The relief claimed as above is vague and it is not clear as to which case the petitioner wants to be decided within a period of two months.

(3.) In paragraph 3 of the writ petition petitioner has said that the brother of the petitioner has made an application before the Consolidation Officer, Mathura on 24.7.07 praying that the valuation of Gata No. 443 is same and different valuation is illegal because owner of Gata No. 443 is co-sharer.