VEERBHAN Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CASE called out in the revised list.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the revisionist is not present nor the Learned Counsel for the opposite party is present. Learned A.G.A. is present.

(3.) IT is contended on behalf of the revisionist that the judgment passed by the trial court is against the evidence on record, because the trial court has wrongly disbelieved the evidence adduced by the prosecution and has overvalued the evidence adduced by the opposite party and that the witnesses produced by prosecution were natural witnesses.